作者：SimonSinek
出版社：Portfolio
出版年：2019-10
页数：272
装帧：Hardcover
ISBN：9780735213500
内容简介
······
n finite games, like football or chess, the players are known, the rules are fixed, and the endpoint is clear. The winners and losers are easily identified.
In infinite games, like business or politics or life itself, the players come and go, the rules are changeable, and there is no defined endpoint. There are no winners or losers in an infinite game; there is only ahead and behind.
The more I started to understand the difference between finite and infinite games, the more I began to see infinite games all around us. I started to see that many of the struggles that organizations face exist simply because their leaders were playing with a finite mindset in an infinite game. These organizations tend to lag behind in innovation, discretionary effort, morale and ultimately performance.
The leaders who embrace an infinite mindset, in stark contrast, build stronger, more innovative, more inspiring organizations. Their people trust each other and their leaders. They have the resilience to thrive in an ever-changing world, while their competitors fall by the wayside. Ultimately, they are the ones who lead the rest of us into the future.
Any worthwhile undertaking starts with Why – the purpose, cause or belief that inspires us to do what we do and inspires others to join us. Good leaders know how to build Circles of Safety that promote trust and cooperation throughout their organizations. But that’s not enough to help us chart a course through the unpredictable, often chaotic landscape of today’s marketplace.
I now believe that the ability to adopt an infinite mindset is a prerequisite for any leader who aspires to leave their organization in better shape than they found it.Age Range: Adult
作者简介
······
国际知名演讲家，其领导力演讲在TED排名第三，他还是“2019年全球最具影响力的50大管理思想家”之一。
《纽约时报》《华尔街日报》《华盛顿邮报》《商业周刊》等媒体的专栏作家。
毕业于英国布兰迪斯大学，现在美国哥伦比亚大学的战略沟通课程中执教。
评论 ······
也许有些道理，但是把案例分析都写成尿点也是挺不容易
finite vs. infinite mindset是一个思考问题的好角度：要有愿景、不止追求短期绩效、竞争对手令自己更好、关心他人（用户/员工）。论证太草率，明显有幸存者偏差和归因上的跳跃。之前别人吹捧的Jack Welch在本书里被立为负面典型。
一点点connect了我这些年都在思考的dots。
持续坚持公司的使命和愿景。作者用了Just cause。
如何看待竞争。worthy rivals instead of competitors。
finite thinking：win
infinite thinking：stay in the game
评论前必须登录！
注册