Is Critique Secular? : Blasphemy, Injury, and Free Speech

0
(0)

Is Critique Secular?
: Blasphemy, Injury, and Free Speech

作者:TalalAsad/JudithButler/SabaMahmood/[美国]朱迪斯·巴特勒

出版社:DoreenB.TownsendCenterfortheHumani

副标题:Blasphemy,Injury,andFreeSpeech

出版年:2009-11-1

页数:154

定价:USD16.95

装帧:Paperback

ISBN:9780982329412

内容简介
······

In this volume, four leading thinkers of our times confront the paradoxes and dilemmas attending the supposed stand-off between Islam and liberal democratic values. Taking the controversial Danish cartoons of Mohammad as a point of departure, Talal Asad, Wendy Brown, Judith Butler, and Saba Mahmood inquire into the evaluative frameworks at stake in understanding the conflicts between blasphemy and free speech, between religious taboos and freedoms of thought and expression, and between secular and religious world views. Is the language of the law an adequate mechanism for the adjudication of such conflicts? What other modes of discourse are available for the navigation of such differences in multicultural and multi-religious societies? What is the role of critique in such an enterprise? These are among the pressing questions this volume addresses.

作者简介
······

Talal Asad was born in Saudi Arabia and educated in Britain. He now teaches anthropology at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York.

评论 ······

好久没读一本书读的这么佩服又感动。Asad真是洞察和清晰的典范,在干货的系谱学部分,扣住blesphemy一词展开,利用seduction作为切入点,清晰地勾勒出伊斯兰语境中私人的disblief和在公开领域中引导别人走向disblief的行为的差别,穿透了free speech构建中的排他性。可贵的是他在许多问题上的省慎和留白态度,比如伊斯兰对seduction的观念如何应对modern con…

核心论题是新教与现代西方世俗国家之间存在亲缘关系,二者的共谋使伊斯兰教显得不可理喻,例如Saba Mahmood指出新教强调主体/客体、能指/所指、形式/本质的二分,穆斯林却将宗教符号等同于神圣者的具身化,于是自诩普适的“新教世俗主义”视其为范畴谬误加以贬抑。

一场从“日德兰邮报穆罕默德漫画事件”引发的纷扰谈起的圆桌会,非常棒~

辩的神哲学经多是老话,但是值得注意的是竟然辩伊斯兰教得出来的也是犹太-基督教老话;问题意识也是很明确的,就是:欧洲世俗主义并非独立于基督教传统;问题怎么解决呢,说了一堆有的没的,话术倒是可以学学

点击星号评分!

平均分 0 / 5. 投票数: 0

还没有投票!请为他投一票。

评论 抢沙发

评论前必须登录!

 

登录

找回密码

注册